#So bad. (2008-11-27) Initial reviews I read said this movie was terrible so I skipped seeing it in the theater. I ve since read some reviews that said Hey it s really not that bad. YES IT REALLY IS THAT BAD. It s so bad that if you looked up Bad Movie in the dictionary they d say See Movie: Get Smart. It s really that bad. Is it worth a 99 cent rental? Not even. What a disappointment, and I love Steve Carrel and especially the Rock. But this movie is totally stupid. If you read this and still rent it, you ll later kick yourself for not taking my advice. Wait until TBS is s...
#entertaining (2008-11-27) I really enjoyed this movie, took me back to the orgional. Had a good plot and the acting was very pleasing. Lot of action and humor. Hope they make a sequel.
#decent (2008-11-26) This was a decent movie, although I am disappointed that there were rarely any laugh your head off movies like austin powers had. It was a decent film though with funny moments though.
#If not for Anne Hathaway...... (2008-11-25) Yeah, this pretty much sucked. . . a few laughs, nothing very memorable. I was really hoping for something decent with Steve Carrel and all. . . . but, Anne Hathway. . . DAMN! Her hotness burns through the suck so you can actually make your way to the end of the suckness.
#Unexpected gem (2008-11-25) I am not the biggest fan of romantic comedies but my boyfriend was excited to watch this. I love video on demand movies so I downloaded it, and we cracked up for the next 2 hours. Russel Brand was an unexpected gem in the movie, and all the actors did a great job. Plot was about what you would expect, but the dialog was terrific.
#Really, it s a good flick (2008-12-02) Oh for heaven s sake. This is not Godard or Truffaut we re talking about. It s an Indiana Jones movie, for chrissakes, a franchise actually based on cheesy, B-movie serials!! Why are people expecting something along the lines of The English Patient?The film moves briskly in a reasonable running time (why is everything 2-1/2 hours long now?), has some quiet moments that are charming (unlike most of what passes (at blinding headache-inducing speed) for entertainment these days), and ties up some nice ends from the first film. (Don t worry, unlik...
#Indiana Jones, too much of a good thing (2008-12-01) Unfortunately, there is way too much of an effort of this film to get laughs. The sarcasm is over the top. The film, apparently, was directed at a much younger audience, who care more about fast-paced action than a intricate plot. The special effects were way overboard and took away from any real storyline and/or dialogue. Entertaining, perhaps, but in my opinion this series has come to a screeching hault.
#How Bad can a movie be? (2008-11-29) Really, really bad. . . and, just forget that the story is non-existent and is essentially a two-hour chase without end or meaning. No Nazis ths time. It s 1954 so the enemies are Russians. But, get this, our perennial good samaritan Harrison Ford actually climbs inside an abandoned refrigerator! A children s movie for God s sake!--and, Harrison Ford climbs inside an abandoned refrigerator! Oh, btw, the purpose was to protect himself from a nuclear blast. Jeez. . . need I say more?
